Whales Withdraw $1.6B from USDe After KelpDAO Exploit
About $1.6 billion was pulled from USDe in April after a roughly $293 million KelpDAO bridge exploit, prompting an estimated $13-15 billion exit from DeFi into USDC and USDT.
On-chain data show roughly $1.6 billion of USDe was withdrawn in April, concentrated in a five-day span after a roughly $293 million bridge exploit at KelpDAO. The withdrawals reduced USDe supply to about $4.278 billion.
The redemptions coincided with an estimated $13-15 billion capital exit from decentralized finance and a rotation of assets into USDC and USDT. Large holders redeemed USDe to cover positions or move into plain stablecoins as borrowing costs on lending platforms increased.
On-chain records show more than $600 million was lost to DeFi exploits in the first three weeks of April, and the KelpDAO breach highlighted weaknesses in cross-chain bridge design.
Ethena kept its mint and redeem functions active but paused LayerZero OFT bridges to limit exposure to shared cross-chain vulnerabilities after heavy redemptions. An updated proof-of-reserves filing from Ethena showed about $5.6 billion in collateral and a 101.2% collateralization ratio.
Ethena changed its reserve mix, reducing futures and perpetuals exposure to about 11% and increasing holdings of Treasury bills and overcollateralized loans. Large holders divested ENA and related instruments after roughly $27 million in losses linked to the synthetic dollar.
Aave recorded about $6.6 billion in withdrawals over two days. Protocols including SparkLend and Fluid restricted access to certain assets to contain bad debt, which locked billions and pushed utilization rates to 100% on some markets.
Smaller security incidents also occurred: a $1.2 million domain hijack at Cow Swap, a $13.7 million wallet drain at Grinex, and $7.6 million in fraudulent tokens tied to Rhea Finance.
Market data show a late-2025 depeg on a major exchange that briefly pushed a stablecoin to roughly $0.65 after an approximately $19 billion liquidation. Derivatives funding rates fell to about 4.4%, and those moves coincided with reduced demand for higher-yield synthetic dollars.
Lido received inflows as users left more complex lending strategies, and Singapore Gulf Bank added USDe to its institutional settlement options. On-chain activity shows capital moving into USDC and USDT while protocols that rely on synthetic collateral and cross-chain mechanics experienced increased withdrawals and temporary operational pauses.
Content on BlockPort is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial guidance.
We strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the information we share, but we do not guarantee that all content is complete, error-free, or up to date. BlockPort disclaims any liability for losses, mistakes, or actions taken based on the material found on this site.
Always conduct your own research before making financial decisions and consider consulting with a licensed advisor.
For further details, please review our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer.








