Write for Us – Guidelines
Blockport publishes evidence-based reporting and analysis on AI, prediction markets, iGaming, esports, crypto, and regulation. We’re looking for articles from people who understand these sectors deeply and can explain them clearly to readers making real decisions.
What we publish: reported analysis, regulatory breakdowns, market structure pieces, technical explainers, platform research, and commentary grounded in data, first-hand expertise, or primary-source documentation.
What we reject: promotional content, paid placements disguised as editorial, hype-driven speculation, thin opinion pieces, and AI-generated copy without subject-matter expertise or original insight.
Our standards: editorial independence is mandatory. We do not guarantee coverage in exchange for payment, access, or relationships. Published content must be original, exclusive to Blockport, and open to editorial revision for clarity, accuracy, structure, and legal risk.
If you have expertise and can write clearly about digital markets, emerging technology, online gaming ecosystems, competitive gaming, policy, or financial infrastructure, we’d like to hear from you.
Latest Partnership Coverage
For partnership inquiries, please contact us by email [email protected].
Editorial Principles
Independence is non-negotiable. We do not publish advertorials, ghostwritten company articles, or promotional pieces designed to benefit a specific product, token, platform, operator, or brand. Every article must put reader value first.
We look for work that helps readers understand what changed, why it matters, what the evidence shows, and where uncertainty still remains. Strong submissions are factual, precise, and useful — not written to impress insiders or push narratives.
We maintain full editorial control. That includes headline writing, structure, fact-checking, style edits, legal review, and the right to decline, revise, or remove outdated content when necessary.
Who Reads Blockport
Our readers follow the overlap between finance, technology, digital assets, online gaming, and regulation. They include market participants, operators, analysts, founders, policy watchers, industry professionals, and informed general readers who want signal instead of noise.
They are looking for sharp reporting, clean analysis, and practical context across fast-moving sectors — especially where AI, crypto, gaming, and regulation intersect.
Content We Accept
News & Analysis
Timely articles on major developments in AI, crypto, prediction markets, iGaming, esports, and regulation. We value reporting that goes beyond the headline and explains the market, product, policy, or business implications.
Regulation & Policy
Coverage of bills, enforcement actions, licensing frameworks, compliance shifts, court decisions, and international policy trends. Use primary sources wherever possible, including official statements, filings, legal texts, or regulator publications.
Market Structure & Industry Research
Pieces explaining how markets, platforms, incentives, or business models work in practice. This includes stablecoins, trading venues, betting infrastructure, AI monetization, esports economics, and adjacent financial or digital systems.
Technical Explainers
Clear, accessible breakdowns of products, protocols, infrastructure, tooling, data systems, or platform mechanics. Technical depth is welcome, but clarity is essential.
Investigations & Reported Features
Original reporting, interviews, document-based stories, or deep dives into trends, conflicts, risks, emerging products, or overlooked developments across our core coverage areas.
Opinion with Evidence
We may accept argument-driven pieces when they are grounded in facts, fair reasoning, and transparent methodology. Strong views are welcome. Unsupported claims are not.
Content We Reject
We do not accept:
- token promotions or project marketing
- casino, sportsbook, token, or platform advertisements presented as editorial
- price prediction articles with no rigorous methodology
- generic “top 10” lists with little original value
- rewritten news with no new angle
- AI-generated articles submitted without expert authorship, verification, and meaningful editing
- purely speculative opinion pieces that rely on broad claims instead of evidence
- plagiarized, syndicated, or previously published content
Note: this does not exclude professional market analysis. We are open to well-supported research, provided the assumptions, framework, and evidence are clearly stated.
Format Requirements
Length: usually 800–2,000 words
Tone: direct, informed, and readable — avoid hype, filler, and jargon-heavy writing
Structure: strong headline, concise opening, clear subheadings, and a conclusion or key takeaway
Sourcing: primary sources preferred; secondary sources should add value, not carry the article
Originality: submissions must be original and not under review elsewhere
Links: limited, relevant, and non-promotional; one external link in the author bio is usually enough
What We Look For
Original insight
Bring something useful: first-hand expertise, actual reporting, data synthesis, technical knowledge, legal interpretation, operator perspective, or a genuinely fresh angle.
Strong sourcing
Show where the information comes from. Link to documents, filings, datasets, transcripts, product materials, or research when possible. Quotes and numbers must be attributable.
Clear thinking
The best pieces are well argued, well structured, and easy to follow. We value sharp reasoning more than flashy language.
Honest disclosure
If you hold relevant assets, work with a mentioned company, advise a related project, or have another material connection, disclose it upfront.
Examples
We accept:
- “How AI Agents Are Reshaping Digital Payments Infrastructure”
- “What a New Stablecoin Licensing Regime Means for Exchanges and Banks”
- “Why Prediction Market Rules Are Becoming a State-by-State Legal Fight”
- “How Esports Betting Economics Are Changing as Publishers Tighten Control”
- “What New Gaming Compliance Rules Mean for Operators Entering Regulated Markets”
We reject:
- “Why This Token Will 10x This Year”
- “The Best Crypto Casino You Need to Join Today”
- a platform review with no testing, no evidence, and no critical assessment
- a regulatory article based only on social media commentary
Review Process
We evaluate submissions based on topic relevance, originality, quality of argument, sourcing, accuracy, and fit with Blockport’s editorial standards.
Accepted submissions may go through edits for structure, fact-checking, style, and compliance. We may request revisions before publication. Declined submissions usually do not receive detailed feedback.
Common reasons for rejection include promotional intent, weak sourcing, lack of subject expertise, no original angle, poor fit with our coverage, or overlap with topics we already have in progress.
Questions? [email protected].
