Trump gives Senate 24 days to pass CLARITY Act
President Trump urged the Senate to pass the CLARITY Act by Aug. 7 and to secure the 60 votes needed to advance the bill before the chamber’s summer recess.
President Donald Trump on July 13 urged the Senate to approve the CLARITY Act by Aug. 7 and to secure the 60 votes needed to advance the bill before Congress departs for its summer recess, setting a 24-day deadline.
Trump posted a message on July 13 that read: “China, and many other countries, would like to take complete and total control of this major financial ‘happening,’ as well as A.I., where we are now leading, but where they are fighting hard. Don’t let China win on either subject!!!”
The CLARITY Act would set a federal framework for cryptocurrency trading and issuance and divide oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The bill would build on the GENIUS Act, the stablecoin law the president signed in 2025. The House passed its version last year. Senate Banking and Agriculture committees each advanced separate texts and senators are negotiating to combine them into a single package. No floor vote has been scheduled.
The White House and industry officials say a federal framework is needed to keep the United States competitive with China in digital assets and artificial intelligence. Patrick Witt, the administration’s lead digital-assets adviser, described the coming days as a “critical week” for the legislation and warned that further delay would waste months of legislative work. CFTC Chairman Mike Selig urged lawmakers to establish clear statutory standards for digital-asset firms, arguing that reliance on enforcement actions and older laws risks weakening U.S. leadership in crypto and related technologies.
Several policy disputes remain unresolved. Senate Democrats are pushing ethics provisions that would limit the ability of presidents, vice presidents, members of Congress and senior officials to profit from digital-asset businesses while in office. Those requests intensified after the president’s 2025 financial disclosure listed more than $1.4 billion tied to crypto ventures, including roughly $800 million linked to World Liberty Financial and about $635 million tied to Trump-branded meme coins. The White House rejects suggestions that the president’s business interests have shaped policy. The Banking Committee rejected an ethics amendment in May, and Democrats plan to press the issue again before any floor vote.
Banking organizations have raised concerns about stablecoin reward programs. They contend that the GENIUS Act’s ban on direct stablecoin interest left room for platforms to offer reward products that resemble deposit yields, potentially drawing deposits away from community banks and reducing local lending. The Independent Community Bankers of America has run an advertising campaign opposing what it calls preferential treatment for crypto firms. Crypto companies have urged lawmakers to distinguish rewards tied to transactions, liquidity provision or participation from passive interest.
The bill would generally protect developers from classification as money transmitters when they create or maintain decentralized software and do not control customer funds. Cryptocurrency advocates argue developers should not face criminal or regulatory liability for publishing code or building noncustodial tools. Some law-enforcement groups cautioned that a broad exemption could complicate investigations into money laundering and sanctions evasion. The National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives endorsed the CLARITY Act, saying a clearer regulatory regime would improve investigative visibility and provide more resources for combating financial crime.
The Senate’s vote math and calendar leave a narrow window. Before Sen. Lindsey Graham’s death, Republicans held 53 seats. South Carolina’s governor appointed Darline Graham Nordone as an interim replacement; if she is sworn in before a cloture vote, Republicans would again hold 53 seats. If all Republicans support the bill, sponsors would need at least seven Democrats to reach the 60 votes typically required to end debate. Only two Democrats, Ruben Gallego and Angela Alsobrooks, backed the bill during the Banking Committee markup and neither has committed to a floor vote without negotiated changes on ethics, consumer protection and illicit finance.
The House is scheduled to leave Washington on July 23 and the Senate on Aug. 7, which supporters say leaves August as the last realistic window before the midterm campaign season limits legislative time. If negotiators cannot produce a unified text and secure the necessary votes, the next possible opportunities are a brief September session or a post-election lame-duck period.
Content on BlockPort is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial guidance.
We strive to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the information we share, but we do not guarantee that all content is complete, error-free, or up to date. BlockPort disclaims any liability for losses, mistakes, or actions taken based on the material found on this site.
Always conduct your own research before making financial decisions and consider consulting with a licensed advisor.
For further details, please review our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimer.








